PJM6610 Northeastern Week 1 Agile Methodology for Business Analysis PPT For this assignment, you will provide a presentation per the attached slide guide.

PJM6610 Northeastern Week 1 Agile Methodology for Business Analysis PPT For this assignment, you will provide a presentation per the attached slide guide. This presentation will distinguish best practices in how the specific project approach/topic influences and informs business analysis work and to also share good practices in business analysis when completing business analysis work in a project following this approach/ in this domain .

Topics/ Approaches include:

Predictive (Waterfall)
Adaptive (Agile)
Hybrid
Other approach of your choice (please check with instructor for approval)

This assignment will run over the first 4 weeks of the course and is due at the end of Week 4. This should be posted to the Assignment link, the Turnitin link and to the provided DB thread. Peer reviews of your work will be part of our Week 5 DB work.

Your presentation should not be longer than 10 minutes. Week 1: Foundations of Business Analysis – Methodology
Overview and Rationale
In order to demonstrate proficiency with the content in this course we will complete a number of different assignments to validate
your learning – and allow you to implement relevant practices a real-world setting.
PJM 6610 Learning Outcomes
Develop a strong framework and understanding of the role of Business Analyst
•
•
•
•
Develop a framework for integrating business analysis good practices in the project management environment –
considering organizational and environmental complexity
Understand and interpret the impacts that AI will have on the process of business analysis and construct strategies for
adapting processes to the process of developing requirements
Design and implement processes that integrate change into organizational systems
Design and organize a project needs assessment based upon industry best practices and standard applications (business
case, benefits realization, benefits sustainment and transition)
Essential Components
For this assignment, you will provide a presentation per the attached slide guide. This presentation will distinguish best
practices in how the specific project approach/topic influences and informs business analysis work and to also share good
practices in business analysis when completing business analysis work in a project following this approach. Be sure to link in
course learnings from Weeks 1 – 4 to inform this work, as well as outside sources you may draw from. Be sure to use APA6 for
all citations in the presentation as well as your reference slide.
Topics/ Approaches include:
•
•
Predictive (Waterfall)
Adaptive (Agile)
•
•
•
Incremental/Iterative
Hybrid
Other approach of your choice (please check with instructor for approval)
Slide Guide:
Slide 1 – Overview of your selected approach
Slide 2 – Influence of this approach on how business analysis work is done
Slide 3 – Good practices in business analysis when following this approach
Slide 4 – Challenges in the project/business analysis when following this approach and how to address
Slide 5 – How this approach would work in our term project and insights/considerations in the BA approach for success
Slide 6 – References (be sure to also site any references in the slide)
This presentation should include a voice over or detailed notes – that if read would be an actual presentation. Consider the
audience for this presentation a “Lunch and Learn” of business analysts. If these are not provided, the highest grade earned is
a B-.
This assignment will run over the first 4 weeks of the course and is due at the end of Week 4. This should be posted to the
Assignment link, the Turnitin link and to the provided DB thread. Peer reviews of your work will be part of our Week 5 DB
work.
An Assignment Link and Turnitin Link for submission is included in Week 4.
Assignment Rubric
Category
Above Standard
Meets Standards
Approaching
Standards
Below Standards
Not
Evident
Assignment
requirements
(60%)
Goes well above the
requirements of the
assignment.
Provides new
information, tools,
and/or techniques
Goes above the
minimum
requirements of the
assignment
Meets minimum
assignment
requirements
Meets some
assignment
requirements
Does not meet the
requirements of the
assignment.
Critical Thinking
(15%)
Professional insights
into depth and breadth
of assignment – goes
WELL beyond
assignment
requirements to
explore risks and/or
relevant new
techniques.
Comprehensive
explanation of the
issue; exploration of
expert viewpoints and
use of evidence to
inform interpretation
and analysis; thorough
evaluation of the
context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position; wellinformed conclusions
based on methodically
prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Includes an explanation
of the issue;
exploration of expert
viewpoints and use of
evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; includes an
evaluation of the
context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position;
conclusions are based
on methodically
prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Includes a general
explanation of the issue
but is vague or is not
clearly linked to the
identified risks;
includes some
exploration of expert
viewpoints and use of
evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; includes a
general evaluation of
the context (historical,
ethical, cultural,
environmental or
circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position, but
lack specificity;
conclusions are based
Does not explain the
issue; does not explore
expert viewpoints or
use evidence to inform
interpretation and
analysis; does not
provide an evaluation
of the context
(historical, ethical,
cultural, environmental
or circumstantial
settings), and self and
others’ assumptions
and perspectives when
stating a position;
conclusions are not
based on prioritized
evidence and
perspectives.
on prioritized evidence
and perspectives.
Communication
(20%) (includes
grammar,
presentation
and clarity)
Goes well beyond
assignment
requirements to
communicate
information in a
precise, insightful and
professional manner.
Assignment is well
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. High quality
grammar. No
misspellings.
Assignment is
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. High quality
grammar. No
misspellings.
Assignment is well
organized, and the
format can be followed.
It is evident to reader
what is contained in
each section of the
report. Good quality
grammar. Minor
misspellings.
Assignment is not
organized. It is not
evident to reader what
is contained in each
section of report. Low
quality grammar,
misspellings.
Formatting
(5%)
Virtually no errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Rare errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Some errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Multiple errors in
formatting, citations,
or references.
Does not submit
assignment materials
in APA 6 format.
NOTE: Gross
failure to
provide
PROPER
citations and
references –
particularly
with regard to
direct quotes –
will result in
sanctions as
outlined in the
academic
honesty policy

Purchase answer to see full
attachment